04 Apr 2006 - GeoWeb and Survival Part II - Towards Environmental Security
In our previous note, GeoWeb and Survival, we looked at the importance of managing the environment on natural zone boundaries rather than in terms of the political units that exist today. Of course it is highly unlikely that we will in the proximate future actually alter the existing political boundaries. Even if we did, such a move would be insufficient because the zones of natural management overlap one another and often in complex ways. Hence we need a way to acquire information on a natural management zone basis while at the same time retaininig our existing politicial infrastructure. I agree that this is only half the story, since to act effectively we must also modify the interaction of the politicial institutions so that they can react in the appropriate fashion to the information views organized on the basis of natural management zones. This second and vital component of the response we will have to leave to others, noting that without the unified information view such a new direction for the management response is both unlikely and unworkable.
It should be mentioned in passing that we have in effect two notions of GeoWeb in this discussion. The first in the information GeoWeb that is the subject of this blog. The second is that of the "web of life" that natural scientists and system thinkers have embraced for a very long time. Since the natural processes are by definition distributed over the surface of the earth, it is no stretch to think of this as also a GeoWeb. It is the fusion of these concepts of GeoWeb that is at the heart of the current discussion.
So how can the GeoWeb (information technology) help us to deal with the GeoWeb(natural systems and the environment)?
One of the difficulties that we face in moving to management based on natural zones is the misalignment of information boundaries. As we have already noted existing information boundaries are based on more or less arbitrary political units defined by nation states and subdividied into states, provinces, counties, communities, cities and municipalities. In fact there is a myriad of such boundaries which overlap one another in a completely arbitrary fashion. None of this is likely to change.
The way forward is to put in place Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDI) that provide transparent access to the information managed by these politically defined jurisidictions. Applications for analysis, mapping, display, and other forms of decision support can then be constructed on top of the SDI layer thus providing the applications for negotiation and management in the natural management zone.
Now I did not say that this is an easy task. Different jurisdctions means different vendor technologies are used. It also means that the world is modeled in different ways with only a rough correspondance between the entities of one jurisdiction and those of another. Furthermore, the jursidictions posesss the expertise to actual create, document and manage their part of the information. They are the stewards or custodians of that information and this must be respected if we are to have any hope that the information we are sharing is accurate and current. Finally, we must note that bringing disparate information sources together will reveal not only intrinsic errors within the individual data components, but conflicts also between the one component and another.
Any solution to these problems is only going to be approximate at best, but this is still miles ahead of moving forward with out any information or with information which is very incomplete or very out of date.
Existing SDI technology can go a long way to addressing these problems.
GML can provide a common schema language by which information providers can expose their information models to one another and so do in the context of the Internet. Furthermore such models can readily be maintained and shared as they change in one jurisdiction or another. The mere fact of sharing these models can lead to changes and to important integration of concepts and vocabulary. When I see that your street is the same as my road, either one of us can change or we can provide the appropriate automated mapping tools to transform requests and data from one system to the other. In the not too distant future technologies such as OWL will allow us to define the underlyng objects ("what is a lake?") in a machine readable form thus enabling such mappings to be defined by computer assisted techniques, and possiblty completely automated ones in the farther future.
Web Feature Services (WFS) can provide the necessary movement of data and can do in a transparent manner possibly exploiting the schema-based data transformations referenced above. Furthermore, advanced WFS can also apply on-the-fly data integrity checks to provide assurance that data meets the required "community" data quality standards. Furthermore this can be done in an open and transparent fashion.
Web Registry Services (WRS) can be used to "register" the members of the community - i.e. the set of data providers and processing services that make up a given natural management zone and can enable automated (machine driven) access to information resources distributed on the various WFS. Furthermore, the WRS can manage projects and other activities managed by the mutliple jurisidictions (multiple agencies) that interact within the management zone.
In effect, SDI technology provides the foundation layer to create a virtual (or realized) information base that underpins the decision support applications on which management of natural zone will depend. Different government agencies can thus more readily co-operate (and negotiate) on how the zone is to be managed. Moreover such an infrastructure can be deployed in a such a way as to survive the enumerable re-organizetions that government agencies and large corporations are heir to.
By providing this information base without upsetting the existing apple cart of political and administrative authorities we may find a way forward to manage our interaction with the world in a saner manner than is possible today. Perhaps this arcane worold of XML and Web Services may make a not insignificant contribution to our long term survoval.
15 Comments | Leave a comment»
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Blog Entries:
08 May 2008 - Looking ahead to GeoWeb 200921 Apr 2008 - Spatial Infrastructures, IFC & Collaborative Engineering
14 Apr 2008 - KML released as an OGC Specification
02 Apr 2008 - BIM/CAD/GIS Integration
13 Mar 2008 - Structuralism and Data Exchange
05 Mar 2008 - Building the GeoWeb in your own backyard
03 Mar 2008 - Davos of Geo in Vancouver
28 Feb 2008 - What are coordinates?
19 Feb 2008 - Does the invisible hand always get it right?
31 Jan 2008 - “Design for Test” in the GeoWeb
23 Jan 2008 - GeoWeb Local - GML in Local Government
15 Jan 2008 - GML Core and Extensions
04 Jan 2008 - GeoWeb 3D
21 Dec 2007 - What are the key issues for geographic information technology?
26 Nov 2007 - GML in the Back Office
19 Nov 2007 - CAD- BIM-GIS-Games Integration
07 Nov 2007 - What’s in a name? Searching for the right words
23 Aug 2007 - KML Placemarks as Observations
29 Jun 2007 - Where GML was right .. and wrong
17 May 2007 - From GML 1.0 onwards - a brief history
17 May 2007 - GML and Database Interoperability
10 May 2007 - GeoWeb Manifesto
09 May 2007 - Meltdown and the Maze - Toward a Real Time Geography
08 May 2007 - GML, KML, Sensor Data, Imagery
20 Apr 2007 - Transporting GML in KML
21 Mar 2007 - The Architecture of the GeoWeb
14 Feb 2007 - From Interoperability to Infrastructure
14 Feb 2007 - GML without Geometry
18 Dec 2006 - ebRIM gets the nod at the OGC
06 Oct 2006 - In praise of complexity
05 Oct 2006 - Infrastructure - the next step past interoperability
12 Jun 2006 - GML and ebRIM
21 May 2006 - Features, Observations and Authorization
21 Apr 2006 - Transfer and Transaction Models
12 Apr 2006 - Feature Catalogues/Dictionaries, GML and RDF/S
10 Apr 2006 - Genus Loci
04 Apr 2006 - GeoWeb and Survival Part II - Towards Environmental Security
04 Apr 2006 - GeoWeb and Survival
17 Mar 2006 - Schemas, Interoperability and RDBMS
14 Mar 2006 - SDI Concepts
05 Mar 2006 - GML Complexity Re-visited
05 Mar 2006 - Observations are for more than sensor data
05 Mar 2006 - Application Schemas Drive Profiles
25 Feb 2006 - The problem with XML
15 Feb 2006 - The importance of profiles
08 Feb 2006 - One person’s metadata is another person’s …
07 Feb 2006 - From Soup to Nuts
02 Feb 2006 - GeoRSS - GML in news feeds
31 Jan 2006 - Performance and the GeoWeb
27 Jan 2006 - Remote API’S, Web Services and the GeoWeb
19 Jan 2006 - GeoWeb 2006 - GeoWeb Grows Up
09 Jan 2006 - Dealing with time in GML
23 Dec 2005 - Dynamic
14 Dec 2005 - GML in the cockpit
01 Dec 2005 - SDI - What is it really?
25 Nov 2005 - GML is the same for all applications
25 Nov 2005 - Schemas and Profiles - whats the difference?
22 Nov 2005 - Schemas - why the big deal?
15 Nov 2005 - GML for Geographic Imagery
13 Nov 2005 - GML, and KML - Why the fuss?
10 Nov 2005 - Is GML a format?
09 Nov 2005 - Embedding GML in “foreign” grammars
03 Nov 2005 - Authentication and Access Control
03 Nov 2005 - OnStar in the era of the GeoWeb
03 Nov 2005 - Do we need to encode location in news feeds?
03 Nov 2005 - gMedia - Towards Geographically Aware Media
03 Nov 2005 - Where are we going?
02 Nov 2005 - Sample XSLT Style Sheet
02 Nov 2005 - Sample KML Output
02 Nov 2005 - Sample GML Data File
02 Nov 2005 - Styling GML to KML - XSLT
02 Nov 2005 - Simple Geometry Schema
01 Nov 2005 - Simple GML Geometry
18 Oct 2005 - Simple GML Geometries
18 Oct 2005 - Styling GML to KML for Visualization
18 Oct 2005 - Some Simple GML Profiles
17 Oct 2005 - Embedding GML in non-GML grammars
17 Oct 2005 - Geotags - the answer to everything?
20 Sep 2005 - GeoWeb 2006
20 Sep 2005 - GML Observations and Features
14 Sep 2005 - What is KML?
07 Sep 2005 - Time in GML
07 Sep 2005 - GML Observations
07 Sep 2005 - GML and KML Syntax
07 Sep 2005 - GeoWeb - Part II - GML and KML
07 Sep 2005 - GI Markup - Part I - Feeding the web with Geographic Information
06 Sep 2005 - GML Complexity
06 Sep 2005 - GML “Sucks”
24 Aug 2005 - Web Feeds and Geographic Information
23 Aug 2005 - What is the Geo-Web?
23 Aug 2005 - IS WGS84 Enough
04 Aug 2005 - Coordinates in GML
03 Aug 2005 - GML Profiles
03 Aug 2005 - GML and Coordinate Systems
03 Aug 2005 - Information Sources
03 Aug 2005 - Features and Geometry Properties
03 Aug 2005 - GML Geometries
03 Aug 2005 - GML FAQ for RSS Geeks and others



