28 Feb 2008 - What are coordinates?
When we see the location of a point expressed as (46.76, 120) what does that mean? How do we know how to interpret those numbers?
Coordinates are a well defined notion from Mathematics that effectively derives from theory of vector spaces, and which is then extended to more general spaces including manifolds (like the surface of the earth), vector and fibre bundles (like linear base referencing systems). Fortunately we can understand most of what we need simply by dealing with the real vector space case, as the other cases all reduce to this model locally.
Consider the assignment of coordinates to points in a room as shown in the figure below.
![]()
Figure 1. Points in a Room modeled as a real vector space
In the vector space approach we model a point as the end point of a vector from some selected origin, perhaps the point O1 as in the figure. We can then define a basis for the vector space model of the room, by assigning basis vectors. We might do this for example by having an e1 basis vector along the intersection of the wall and the floor from O1, and e2 in a similar manner. e3 is then defined as a vector pointing away from the floor and collinear with the intersection of the walls and pointing away from O1. The three basis vectors are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Selecting a basis for the vector space
If we take any point P in the room this defines a vector from O1 to P (O1P). We can then write this vector as a linear combination:
O1P = a.e1 + b.e2 + c.e3
Where a, b, and c are real numbers.
The ordered tuple of numbers (a,b,c) are called the coordinates of the point P with respect to the basis e1, e2 and e3 as shown in Figure 2.
Now without the definition of the basis NO meaning can be assigned to the tuple (a,b,c). Note that we can easily change the basis vectors as the selection in Figure 2. Has no magic importance. For example we choose these vectors as in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Selecting another basis for the vector space
Note that the expression for O1P will not change and it is only by reference to the figure – i.e. the mapping to the real world (our room) that we can differentiate one basis from another.
Each basis defines a coordinate reference system.
Now to generalize this to more complex surfaces (like the surface of the earth) goes beyond this simple discussion, however, the model is exactly the same.
Given a coordinate tuple we cannot interpret it without reference to a coordinate reference system. Clearly, if two different people or organizations interpret (a,b,c) using different coordinate reference systems they will understand things very differently and this can lead to expensive if not tragic results. It is thus essential that the coordinate reference system used to interpret a coordinate tuple be completely unambiguous. It is for this reason that the GML encoding for point contains the reference srsName attribute.
<gml:Point srsName = “urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326”>
<gml:pos>-45.23 110.7</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>
There can be no ambiguity in this case. To resolve these URN references check out the CRS registry of the OGP at http://www.epsg-registry.org.
No Comments | Leave a comment»
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Blog Entries:
08 May 2008 - Looking ahead to GeoWeb 200921 Apr 2008 - Spatial Infrastructures, IFC & Collaborative Engineering
14 Apr 2008 - KML released as an OGC Specification
02 Apr 2008 - BIM/CAD/GIS Integration
13 Mar 2008 - Structuralism and Data Exchange
05 Mar 2008 - Building the GeoWeb in your own backyard
03 Mar 2008 - Davos of Geo in Vancouver
28 Feb 2008 - What are coordinates?
19 Feb 2008 - Does the invisible hand always get it right?
31 Jan 2008 - “Design for Test” in the GeoWeb
23 Jan 2008 - GeoWeb Local - GML in Local Government
15 Jan 2008 - GML Core and Extensions
04 Jan 2008 - GeoWeb 3D
21 Dec 2007 - What are the key issues for geographic information technology?
26 Nov 2007 - GML in the Back Office
19 Nov 2007 - CAD- BIM-GIS-Games Integration
07 Nov 2007 - What’s in a name? Searching for the right words
23 Aug 2007 - KML Placemarks as Observations
29 Jun 2007 - Where GML was right .. and wrong
17 May 2007 - From GML 1.0 onwards - a brief history
17 May 2007 - GML and Database Interoperability
10 May 2007 - GeoWeb Manifesto
09 May 2007 - Meltdown and the Maze - Toward a Real Time Geography
08 May 2007 - GML, KML, Sensor Data, Imagery
20 Apr 2007 - Transporting GML in KML
21 Mar 2007 - The Architecture of the GeoWeb
14 Feb 2007 - From Interoperability to Infrastructure
14 Feb 2007 - GML without Geometry
18 Dec 2006 - ebRIM gets the nod at the OGC
06 Oct 2006 - In praise of complexity
05 Oct 2006 - Infrastructure - the next step past interoperability
12 Jun 2006 - GML and ebRIM
21 May 2006 - Features, Observations and Authorization
21 Apr 2006 - Transfer and Transaction Models
12 Apr 2006 - Feature Catalogues/Dictionaries, GML and RDF/S
10 Apr 2006 - Genus Loci
04 Apr 2006 - GeoWeb and Survival Part II - Towards Environmental Security
04 Apr 2006 - GeoWeb and Survival
17 Mar 2006 - Schemas, Interoperability and RDBMS
14 Mar 2006 - SDI Concepts
05 Mar 2006 - GML Complexity Re-visited
05 Mar 2006 - Observations are for more than sensor data
05 Mar 2006 - Application Schemas Drive Profiles
25 Feb 2006 - The problem with XML
15 Feb 2006 - The importance of profiles
08 Feb 2006 - One person’s metadata is another person’s …
07 Feb 2006 - From Soup to Nuts
02 Feb 2006 - GeoRSS - GML in news feeds
31 Jan 2006 - Performance and the GeoWeb
27 Jan 2006 - Remote API’S, Web Services and the GeoWeb
19 Jan 2006 - GeoWeb 2006 - GeoWeb Grows Up
09 Jan 2006 - Dealing with time in GML
23 Dec 2005 - Dynamic
14 Dec 2005 - GML in the cockpit
01 Dec 2005 - SDI - What is it really?
25 Nov 2005 - GML is the same for all applications
25 Nov 2005 - Schemas and Profiles - whats the difference?
22 Nov 2005 - Schemas - why the big deal?
15 Nov 2005 - GML for Geographic Imagery
13 Nov 2005 - GML, and KML - Why the fuss?
10 Nov 2005 - Is GML a format?
09 Nov 2005 - Embedding GML in “foreign” grammars
03 Nov 2005 - Authentication and Access Control
03 Nov 2005 - OnStar in the era of the GeoWeb
03 Nov 2005 - Do we need to encode location in news feeds?
03 Nov 2005 - gMedia - Towards Geographically Aware Media
03 Nov 2005 - Where are we going?
02 Nov 2005 - Sample XSLT Style Sheet
02 Nov 2005 - Sample KML Output
02 Nov 2005 - Sample GML Data File
02 Nov 2005 - Styling GML to KML - XSLT
02 Nov 2005 - Simple Geometry Schema
01 Nov 2005 - Simple GML Geometry
18 Oct 2005 - Simple GML Geometries
18 Oct 2005 - Styling GML to KML for Visualization
18 Oct 2005 - Some Simple GML Profiles
17 Oct 2005 - Embedding GML in non-GML grammars
17 Oct 2005 - Geotags - the answer to everything?
20 Sep 2005 - GeoWeb 2006
20 Sep 2005 - GML Observations and Features
14 Sep 2005 - What is KML?
07 Sep 2005 - Time in GML
07 Sep 2005 - GML Observations
07 Sep 2005 - GML and KML Syntax
07 Sep 2005 - GeoWeb - Part II - GML and KML
07 Sep 2005 - GI Markup - Part I - Feeding the web with Geographic Information
06 Sep 2005 - GML Complexity
06 Sep 2005 - GML “Sucks”
24 Aug 2005 - Web Feeds and Geographic Information
23 Aug 2005 - What is the Geo-Web?
23 Aug 2005 - IS WGS84 Enough
04 Aug 2005 - Coordinates in GML
03 Aug 2005 - GML Profiles
03 Aug 2005 - GML and Coordinate Systems
03 Aug 2005 - Information Sources
03 Aug 2005 - Features and Geometry Properties
03 Aug 2005 - GML Geometries
03 Aug 2005 - GML FAQ for RSS Geeks and others



