16 Sep 2008 - GeoPresence
“What? You don’t have a web site? Is that possible? It’s only a small company. Does not matter! If you do not have a web site, you do not exist. Period!” This seems a plausible exchange in 2008. Yet no one could have imagined such a conversation as recently as 1980. Not to have a web site has simply become unthinkable. I think the same will soon be said about you or your organization’s Geo-Presence ; the description or model of yourself, your organization or some activity on the Virtual World. Note I did not say Google Earth or Virtual Earth. I will only use those words when I need to talk specifically about one or the other. Otherwise I will talk about Virtual World. This is in part, because I have no desire to curry favour or the opposition of either party, and partly because the issues of which I am going to talk, are more general than either product. Also in the long run I anticipate that there will be to all intents and purposes, but a single Virtual World, there being, after all, but one Real World.
So what might a GeoPresence look like? What might it behave like? Both the visual and behaviour terminology are apt. A GeoPresence might be thought of as a visual and behavioural representative for yourself or your organization, not in a complete world of fantasy such as Second Life, but in some sort of approximation of the real world; the Virtual World. Furthermore, we can expect that this GeoPresence will reflect you or your organization more or less in real time. If a private airplane lands at your county airstrip, we might expect to see this event in our Virtual World as it is happening. If the lake that supplies the cities drinking water is becoming polluted, we might expect to see values of fecal coliform or other such measures also.
More than just showing the world as it is in the present, we can also expect that the GeoPresence will portray the world as it can be expected to look at some point in the future, or as it may look. A mining company might for example, show an undeveloped mine site in the present and provide time dependent and animated scenarios showing the mine’s development and the later land reclamation and remediation of the site. Thus the whole life cycle of the mine might be part of the mine’s GeoPresence. Still more is in the offing. As the avatars of Second Life interact with one another, we can expect various types of interactions between the GeoPresence’s we create in the Virtual World, perhaps reflecting the real world legal infrastructure, and physical dynamics. Some of this is already explored territory in online gaming, so there is no reason to exclude it from the Virtual World. I might for example, create the GeoPresence for my house in such a way as to encroach on my neighbour’s lot. Seeing this, my neighbor might then take me to court in the real world, and obtain a ruling requiring that my GeoPresence be adjusted to reflect the legal reality.
The reflection of physical dynamics has even deeper implications. Today we are able to visualize the weather in our virtual world, and we can even overlay temperature predictions from climate models (see http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1659/ ). The really interesting part will come when the climate models get enough input from the GeoPresence representations to compute the impact on the future. That will be interesting! Of course this is not restricted to climate modeling, nor is it restricted even to physical dynamics. Population dynamics and ecology can also play in a similar manner and there is no reason to exclude political dynamics either!Of course you will claim that I am living in a dream land, and many will agree with you. I think not. It is a matter of social change, and the global realization of the interconnectedness of things. We are increasingly a “global village” and the need for information transparency will become more and more evident with each passing year. This is thinking that challenges age old concerns for personal privacy, and more importantly the protection of elite individuals and elite societies. It thus will not come about in one fell stroke, nor can we look to a future in which the management of the world is transformed into some kind of Game of Perfect Information. Competition and negotiation will remain, however be cast as features of the Virtual World, with the boundaries between what is to be revealed, and what is to be hidden, significantly redrawn.
We need a Virtual World because it can help us develop consensus. Consensus on the state of the world – the state of our ecosystems – the state of our energy and food supplies – states on which everything else depends. Consensus on these issues is essential, because it is all of our actions in the real world that is transforming it, and only by transforming those actions can we hope to alter our course. It is a new reality indeed!
No Comments | Leave a comment»
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Blog Entries:
21 Nov 2008 - Infrastructure for Infrastructure07 Nov 2008 - GeoWeb and eGovernance
31 Oct 2008 - GeoWeb and Emergency Response
17 Oct 2008 - WMS, WFS, and Community Schemas
07 Oct 2008 - From the Age of Aerospace to… ?
02 Oct 2008 - KML, GML and REST
16 Sep 2008 - GeoPresence
08 Sep 2008 - GeoEquilibria-There is no surplus in Nature
29 Aug 2008 - Geographic Entity Registries
01 Aug 2008 - GeoWeb and the State of the World
23 Jul 2008 - Virtual Globes as Essential Services?
07 Jul 2008 - Cascading and Federated WFS and the Concept of Geolinking
30 Jun 2008 - What is an SDI?
16 Jun 2008 - WFS - Schema Mapping is Key
05 Jun 2008 - KML Support
08 May 2008 - Looking ahead to GeoWeb 2009
21 Apr 2008 - Spatial Infrastructures, IFC & Collaborative Engineering
14 Apr 2008 - KML released as an OGC Specification
02 Apr 2008 - BIM/CAD/GIS Integration
13 Mar 2008 - Structuralism and Data Exchange
05 Mar 2008 - Building the GeoWeb in your own backyard
03 Mar 2008 - Davos of Geo in Vancouver
28 Feb 2008 - What are coordinates?
19 Feb 2008 - Does the invisible hand always get it right?
31 Jan 2008 - “Design for Test” in the GeoWeb
23 Jan 2008 - GeoWeb Local - GML in Local Government
15 Jan 2008 - GML Core and Extensions
04 Jan 2008 - GeoWeb 3D
21 Dec 2007 - What are the key issues for geographic information technology?
26 Nov 2007 - GML in the Back Office
19 Nov 2007 - CAD- BIM-GIS-Games Integration
07 Nov 2007 - What’s in a name? Searching for the right words
23 Aug 2007 - KML Placemarks as Observations
29 Jun 2007 - Where GML was right .. and wrong
17 May 2007 - From GML 1.0 onwards - a brief history
17 May 2007 - GML and Database Interoperability
10 May 2007 - GeoWeb Manifesto
09 May 2007 - Meltdown and the Maze - Toward a Real Time Geography
08 May 2007 - GML, KML, Sensor Data, Imagery
20 Apr 2007 - Transporting GML in KML
21 Mar 2007 - The Architecture of the GeoWeb
14 Feb 2007 - From Interoperability to Infrastructure
14 Feb 2007 - GML without Geometry
18 Dec 2006 - ebRIM gets the nod at the OGC
06 Oct 2006 - In praise of complexity
05 Oct 2006 - Infrastructure - the next step past interoperability
12 Jun 2006 - GML and ebRIM
21 May 2006 - Features, Observations and Authorization
21 Apr 2006 - Transfer and Transaction Models
12 Apr 2006 - Feature Catalogues/Dictionaries, GML and RDF/S
10 Apr 2006 - Genus Loci
04 Apr 2006 - GeoWeb and Survival Part II - Towards Environmental Security
04 Apr 2006 - GeoWeb and Survival
17 Mar 2006 - Schemas, Interoperability and RDBMS
14 Mar 2006 - SDI Concepts
05 Mar 2006 - GML Complexity Re-visited
05 Mar 2006 - Observations are for more than sensor data
05 Mar 2006 - Application Schemas Drive Profiles
25 Feb 2006 - The problem with XML
15 Feb 2006 - The importance of profiles
08 Feb 2006 - One person’s metadata is another person’s …
07 Feb 2006 - From Soup to Nuts
02 Feb 2006 - GeoRSS - GML in news feeds
31 Jan 2006 - Performance and the GeoWeb
27 Jan 2006 - Remote API’S, Web Services and the GeoWeb
19 Jan 2006 - GeoWeb 2006 - GeoWeb Grows Up
09 Jan 2006 - Dealing with time in GML
23 Dec 2005 - Dynamic
14 Dec 2005 - GML in the cockpit
01 Dec 2005 - SDI - What is it really?
25 Nov 2005 - GML is the same for all applications
25 Nov 2005 - Schemas and Profiles - whats the difference?
22 Nov 2005 - Schemas - why the big deal?
15 Nov 2005 - GML for Geographic Imagery
13 Nov 2005 - GML, and KML - Why the fuss?
10 Nov 2005 - Is GML a format?
09 Nov 2005 - Embedding GML in “foreign” grammars
03 Nov 2005 - Authentication and Access Control
03 Nov 2005 - OnStar in the era of the GeoWeb
03 Nov 2005 - Do we need to encode location in news feeds?
03 Nov 2005 - gMedia - Towards Geographically Aware Media
03 Nov 2005 - Where are we going?
02 Nov 2005 - Sample XSLT Style Sheet
02 Nov 2005 - Sample KML Output
02 Nov 2005 - Sample GML Data File
02 Nov 2005 - Styling GML to KML - XSLT
02 Nov 2005 - Simple Geometry Schema
01 Nov 2005 - Simple GML Geometry
18 Oct 2005 - Simple GML Geometries
18 Oct 2005 - Styling GML to KML for Visualization
18 Oct 2005 - Some Simple GML Profiles
17 Oct 2005 - Embedding GML in non-GML grammars
17 Oct 2005 - Geotags - the answer to everything?
20 Sep 2005 - GeoWeb 2006
20 Sep 2005 - GML Observations and Features
14 Sep 2005 - What is KML?
07 Sep 2005 - Time in GML
07 Sep 2005 - GML Observations
07 Sep 2005 - GML and KML Syntax
07 Sep 2005 - GeoWeb - Part II - GML and KML
07 Sep 2005 - GI Markup - Part I - Feeding the web with Geographic Information
06 Sep 2005 - GML Complexity
06 Sep 2005 - GML “Sucks”
24 Aug 2005 - Web Feeds and Geographic Information
23 Aug 2005 - What is the Geo-Web?
23 Aug 2005 - IS WGS84 Enough
04 Aug 2005 - Coordinates in GML
03 Aug 2005 - GML Profiles
03 Aug 2005 - GML and Coordinate Systems
03 Aug 2005 - Information Sources
03 Aug 2005 - Features and Geometry Properties
03 Aug 2005 - GML Geometries
03 Aug 2005 - GML FAQ for RSS Geeks and others



