14 Apr 2008 - KML released as an OGC Specification
In the past few weeks, the OGC (Open Geospatial Consortium) passed KML v2.2 as an OGC standard. This is a major step forward for the OGC and for Google, as it moves a key industry specification into the world of open standards.
KML is a very complementary to Geography Markup Language (GML) the other key encoding standard from the OGC. Where GML provides the mechanisms to describe geographic feature types, KML provides the mechanisms to visualize these features on a map or globe, and to control the user’s navigation over that map or globe. This complementary character is illustrated in Figure 1. Here GML data from a WFS is styled on the fly to KML and using a network link is made visible in Google Earth through the latter’s support for the OGC WMS interface. The coloured line segments in the diagram are from a dynamic link model of highway traffic using GML dynamic features and show the occupancy and rate of flow of vehicles (in real time) for the Toronto highway system. Figure 2. shows a more static picture of roadways near Red Deer Alberta that was part of a recent national CGDI demonstration. While Google Earth was used as the client in both of these examples, the adoption of KML as an open standard at the OGC, means that many other earth browsers and mapping clients will be usable in the very near future.

Figure 1. Real Time Traffic Data Styled from a WFS (GML) to KML
As a result of the passage of KML at the OGC we can now anticipate further developments not only within KML itself, but also in terms of other specifications such as the WMS (Web Map Service), Styled Layer Descriptor (SLD), and the Web Map Context specification. Consider for example, the Styled Layer Descriptor – the Symbology Encoding component in particular. This provides styling rules to transform feature data encoded in GML into a target visualization language. In the past this target visualization language was modeled on SVG, and the visualization description now in SLD is essentially derived from SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics). While SVG has some very strong graphics description capabilities, in some areas much stronger than KML, SVG is only 2D and does not incorporate concepts for navigation (e.g. LookAt in KML has no correlate in SVG, SVG graphics window while supporting images, has nothing corresponding to PhotoModel in KML). We can thus anticipate that SLD may be extended in the future to enable more use of KML capabilities.
Figure 2. GML data (from WFS) styled to KML for visual presentation through WMS in Google Earth
The development of KML has also influence the way OGC itself works, with a greater emphasis on running and adopted code prior to standardization. This reflects both the widespread adoption of KML, but also the greater maturity of the OGC and OGC Standards in general.
Future developments of KML are hard to predict but I would bet on enhancing some of the graphics functionality, and perhaps a stronger symbolization construct – maybe even modeled on SVG!
The ground work has now been laid for KML as a global standard for interactive map display and map navigation. Adoption outside of Google is already growing fast with support for KML in Microsoft Virtual Earth already announced and support in many other software products on the near term horizon, including automated validation of KML data streams.
http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2008/04/kml-new-standard-for-sharing-maps.html
No Comments | Leave a comment»
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Blog Entries:
08 May 2008 - Looking ahead to GeoWeb 200921 Apr 2008 - Spatial Infrastructures, IFC & Collaborative Engineering
14 Apr 2008 - KML released as an OGC Specification
02 Apr 2008 - BIM/CAD/GIS Integration
13 Mar 2008 - Structuralism and Data Exchange
05 Mar 2008 - Building the GeoWeb in your own backyard
03 Mar 2008 - Davos of Geo in Vancouver
28 Feb 2008 - What are coordinates?
19 Feb 2008 - Does the invisible hand always get it right?
31 Jan 2008 - “Design for Test” in the GeoWeb
23 Jan 2008 - GeoWeb Local - GML in Local Government
15 Jan 2008 - GML Core and Extensions
04 Jan 2008 - GeoWeb 3D
21 Dec 2007 - What are the key issues for geographic information technology?
26 Nov 2007 - GML in the Back Office
19 Nov 2007 - CAD- BIM-GIS-Games Integration
07 Nov 2007 - What’s in a name? Searching for the right words
23 Aug 2007 - KML Placemarks as Observations
29 Jun 2007 - Where GML was right .. and wrong
17 May 2007 - From GML 1.0 onwards - a brief history
17 May 2007 - GML and Database Interoperability
10 May 2007 - GeoWeb Manifesto
09 May 2007 - Meltdown and the Maze - Toward a Real Time Geography
08 May 2007 - GML, KML, Sensor Data, Imagery
20 Apr 2007 - Transporting GML in KML
21 Mar 2007 - The Architecture of the GeoWeb
14 Feb 2007 - From Interoperability to Infrastructure
14 Feb 2007 - GML without Geometry
18 Dec 2006 - ebRIM gets the nod at the OGC
06 Oct 2006 - In praise of complexity
05 Oct 2006 - Infrastructure - the next step past interoperability
12 Jun 2006 - GML and ebRIM
21 May 2006 - Features, Observations and Authorization
21 Apr 2006 - Transfer and Transaction Models
12 Apr 2006 - Feature Catalogues/Dictionaries, GML and RDF/S
10 Apr 2006 - Genus Loci
04 Apr 2006 - GeoWeb and Survival Part II - Towards Environmental Security
04 Apr 2006 - GeoWeb and Survival
17 Mar 2006 - Schemas, Interoperability and RDBMS
14 Mar 2006 - SDI Concepts
05 Mar 2006 - GML Complexity Re-visited
05 Mar 2006 - Observations are for more than sensor data
05 Mar 2006 - Application Schemas Drive Profiles
25 Feb 2006 - The problem with XML
15 Feb 2006 - The importance of profiles
08 Feb 2006 - One person’s metadata is another person’s …
07 Feb 2006 - From Soup to Nuts
02 Feb 2006 - GeoRSS - GML in news feeds
31 Jan 2006 - Performance and the GeoWeb
27 Jan 2006 - Remote API’S, Web Services and the GeoWeb
19 Jan 2006 - GeoWeb 2006 - GeoWeb Grows Up
09 Jan 2006 - Dealing with time in GML
23 Dec 2005 - Dynamic
14 Dec 2005 - GML in the cockpit
01 Dec 2005 - SDI - What is it really?
25 Nov 2005 - GML is the same for all applications
25 Nov 2005 - Schemas and Profiles - whats the difference?
22 Nov 2005 - Schemas - why the big deal?
15 Nov 2005 - GML for Geographic Imagery
13 Nov 2005 - GML, and KML - Why the fuss?
10 Nov 2005 - Is GML a format?
09 Nov 2005 - Embedding GML in “foreign” grammars
03 Nov 2005 - Authentication and Access Control
03 Nov 2005 - OnStar in the era of the GeoWeb
03 Nov 2005 - Do we need to encode location in news feeds?
03 Nov 2005 - gMedia - Towards Geographically Aware Media
03 Nov 2005 - Where are we going?
02 Nov 2005 - Sample XSLT Style Sheet
02 Nov 2005 - Sample KML Output
02 Nov 2005 - Sample GML Data File
02 Nov 2005 - Styling GML to KML - XSLT
02 Nov 2005 - Simple Geometry Schema
01 Nov 2005 - Simple GML Geometry
18 Oct 2005 - Simple GML Geometries
18 Oct 2005 - Styling GML to KML for Visualization
18 Oct 2005 - Some Simple GML Profiles
17 Oct 2005 - Embedding GML in non-GML grammars
17 Oct 2005 - Geotags - the answer to everything?
20 Sep 2005 - GeoWeb 2006
20 Sep 2005 - GML Observations and Features
14 Sep 2005 - What is KML?
07 Sep 2005 - Time in GML
07 Sep 2005 - GML Observations
07 Sep 2005 - GML and KML Syntax
07 Sep 2005 - GeoWeb - Part II - GML and KML
07 Sep 2005 - GI Markup - Part I - Feeding the web with Geographic Information
06 Sep 2005 - GML Complexity
06 Sep 2005 - GML “Sucks”
24 Aug 2005 - Web Feeds and Geographic Information
23 Aug 2005 - What is the Geo-Web?
23 Aug 2005 - IS WGS84 Enough
04 Aug 2005 - Coordinates in GML
03 Aug 2005 - GML Profiles
03 Aug 2005 - GML and Coordinate Systems
03 Aug 2005 - Information Sources
03 Aug 2005 - Features and Geometry Properties
03 Aug 2005 - GML Geometries
03 Aug 2005 - GML FAQ for RSS Geeks and others



